June 2009 Archives

Month Long Sabbatical

| 1 Comment
123844_m.gif

Real life calls.  I have to take the bar licensing exam at the end of July.  For those unfamiliar with the bar exam, it's the test to become an attorney.  In addition to being an Investor, Gambler, and an Economist, I'm also a Lawyer -- but nobody really likes lawyers.

I will be taking a one month sabbatical from this website to study for the exam.

Why bother creating a website for three months and take a month off?  What about my loyal five readers?  I promise I will have some good stuff in August.  It will blow your fucking mind.

Update:  In the meantime, I'll have Lowball help and be a guest blogger.

A Gem From Security Analysis

| 0 Comments
From Graham's and Dodd's 1940's edition of Security Analysis, p.685:

Can the analyst exploit successfully the repeated exaggerations of the general market?  Experience suggest that a procedure somewhat like the following should turn out to be reasonably satisfactory:
  1. Select a diversified list of leading common stocks, e.g. those in the DJIA
  2. Determine an indicated "normal" value for this group by applying a suitable multiplier to average earnings.  The multiplier might be equivalent to capitalizing the earnings at, say, twice the current interest rate on highest grade industrial bonds.  The period for averaging earnings would ordinarily be seven to ten years, but exceptional conditions such as occurred in 1931-1933 might suggest a different method, e.g., basing the average on the period beginning in 1934, when operating in 1939 or later.
  3. Make composite purchased of the list when the shares can be bought at a substantial discount from normal value, say, at 2/3 such value.  Or purchases may be made on a scale downwards, beginning say, at 80% of normal value.
  4. Sell out such purchases when a price is reached substantially above normal value, say 1/3 higher, or from 20% to 50% higher on a scale basis.

Russia to Relocate Its Casinos

| 0 Comments
_42500267_casino_ap300.jpg
Interesting read on Putin's executive morality in relocating casinos to the outskirts of Russia.  (NYTimes)  I never got a chance to play in Moscow and it's probably a good thing.  I've heard they've got some profitable angles at their casinos, but they're still heavily controlled by organized crime and cheating is not beyond their abilities.  I suppose it's a mixed blessing.

Mothers Just Don't Get It

| 0 Comments
mother.JPGThe NYT has an excellent story of a young poker grinder from the mom's perspective.  My Son's Gamble.  Typical fashion of moms to be overly worried, crazy, and to not understand the math.

Downsize the McSize, p.5

| 0 Comments
No End In Sight To A Thrifty Consumer

*Nothing spectacularly new from Page 1, but a nice repeat of the declining Consumer spending and the mixed blessing of increasing savings rate.

China Lied to Us, p.14

| 0 Comments
On Page 4 of China Takes Over the World, I commented on China's increasing investment in gold.  China tried to smooth talk the plankton investors (term borrowed from B. Gross) by saying they'll keep on buying US dollars/debt .  Its just that China will be buying more gold.  

Now the head of China's economic department of policy research is expressing their preference for dumping the US dollars for gold.  (CNBC).  What some head of some department say does not always mean it is the official policy, but it's a clear indication of the direction China can take.  

I didn't fall for the lies and I hope you didn't too.  It was just denial that investors in USD wanted to hear.  China was cheating and lying to USD investors, and some people just wanted to believe their lies.

The USD to EUR graph is from April 25th when I said, "For the gamblers, USD is not very attractive" to today.  

USDEURO.JPG


The Riviera Is Delisted From the NYSE

| 0 Comments
Riviera Holdings (Riv) which owns the Riviera casino will be delisted from the NYSE for failure to comply with requirements.  Meaning its shares are no longer worth a buck.

I've been to the Riv maybe once.  That place stank.  I had some time to kill and thought I'd scout out the games.  When I left the place, I reeked of body odor and despair.

LAS_RIVE-exter-1.jpg

Fixing the Website

| 0 Comments
The website software has been kind of weird over the past three days.  Apologies if anything looks out of place.

Reasonably Prudent Poker Player

| 1 Comment
I've previously mentioned in my Poker Romps that I am a sincere admirer of Arnold Snyder.  He has done a lot for me.  My poker tournament skills try to mimic the style in the Poker Tournament Formula.

51YGEAZFVEL._SL500_AA240_.jpg
Without hesitation I recommended the PTF to my buddy "Low" and it came almost as a shock that he didn't think highly of the book.  Low said that, "Arnold's method isn't the way of winning tournaments."  Perhaps my own judgment is clouded by my deep respect for Arnold.  Objectively speaking, PTF has an average 4.5 star review from Amazon from many reviewers.  Other meta evaluations rank his books accordingly high.  The wisdom of the crowd has spoken.  His methods have helped a lot of amateur players build their bankrolls.  

I inquired further by asking Low why he felt PTF wasn't the way of making money.  Him being a psychologist, he felt the people game in poker was the most important element.  Low is a successful poker player playing the people game.  As much as I like Low, I can't agree with his assessment.  

In the legal profession, there's a standard called the "reasonably prudent person".  What the reasonably prudent person is, is a legal work of fiction that tries to approximates the average opinion.  We see in real life that reasonably prudent people have differing and contradictory opinions.

Ask reasonably prudent poker players what they believe to be the most important poker skill and you'll get a color swatch full of opinion.  Some poker players like Low might think psychology is the most important aspect of the game.  Others would say bankroll management.  Some would say aggression.  Others would say something else.  PTF manages to capture all of the successful skills required to win poker tournaments.

I understand that players can profit from the people game, but the game of poker is not just a game of people.  Cards do matter.  Probabilities and pot odds do matter.  Meta game analysis--beginning, middle, and end stages matter.  Information advantage  in the form of position matters.  Utility of chips matter.  Poker is not just a people game.  It's a card game and subject to statistical principles.

The point is that people shouldn't be closed to the possibility of finding success in poker through other angles.  Just because someone has found a sliver that is successful does not mean that it's the only means of success.  On the opposite end, if you can't find any success playing the formulaic ways, look for something else.

Put in the time and effort to find different angles to exploit poker.  This advice also applies to trading, blackjack, and any other game.  There's always more than one way to beat the brains out of the competition.  It won't be easy to find these advantageous angles, but they're very rewarding when you do find them.

Betfair Reports Suspicious Wimledon Bets

| 0 Comments
The NYT Reports:

The Wimbledon men's first-round match between Jurgen Melzer, an Austrian player ranked 30th in the world, and Wayne Odesnik, an American ranked 109th, is being reviewed by tennis officials after a sudden rush of money poured into online betting services and traditional London betting shops.

The bookies, however, said they had not found any evidence of match fixing, and blamed nothing more than sharp gamblers discovering the news of an injury for the run on the match. Odesnik, who had strained a thigh, lost in straight sets to Melzer in only Odesnik's second grass match of the year....

Haven't I Already Said This?

| 0 Comments
Exactly two months from today.  I said on April 24, 2009


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/inflation-linked-bonds-look-cheap-after-sell-off?siteid=rss

It's possible that I'm picking the one article in the universe that supports my position.  Am I guilty again of selection bias?

MGM Wants Me to Call Off the Bankruptcy Watch, p.18

| 0 Comments
In the required disclosures with the SEC, MGM said there was "no longer substantial doubt" that it will be going into bankruptcy.  Shares go up.  (Forbes)

*MGM was able to get an extra billion by diluting its shares.  This money might be able to buy them some time but the long term outlook still remains bleak.  Unless Vegas turns around, it will be forced to extending its bare hands out again.  Instead of the previous 70/30 that they'll go bankrupt, maybe it's more like 40/60 within the next two years.

It's always wise to look at company's statements with a skeptical eye.  Legal puffery is just another way of saying they're misleading statements.

From PIMCO's May 2009 Presentation

| 0 Comments
saupload_pimco_6.21.09.jpg

It's like staring at a puzzle.  I've never incorporated "Policy Support" in my evaluation of investment opportunities.  I don't know.  Just doesn't sound objective enough.  How can I cram "Policy Support" into data tables and crank out a neat regression function?

Maybe the Electronic Poker Tables Aren't too Popular

| 0 Comments
ppt.jpgThe Excalibur, one of the first casinos in Vegas to offer electronic poker tables, will be pulling all twelve of them from their poker room.  (Forbes)

*The proposed benefits of these poker tables were to come in the form of faster speeds, no shuffling, and a better transition for internet poker players.  I'll have to admit that I'm not a big fan of these electronic poker tables.  It's nice having a dealer at the table, and there's something satisfying about the feel of the poker table and chips.  

Unrelated Pause: Super Obama

| 0 Comments

B's Got a Six Page Piece in the NYT

| 0 Comments
The Treasury has Bill Gross on speed dial.  (NYTimes)

*Not bad for a card counter.  He made about $10K in the 1960's card counting and now he's got the White House needing his help.

China: Healthier People, Healthier Economy, p.13

| 0 Comments
Beijing has unveiled an ambitious plan to upgrade the healthcare system by 2020 (BusinessWeek):

..."What we're seeing with the new plan is a move back to a more socialist approach to medicine by providing for the majority," said Pollard.

If successful, the sick will not be the only beneficiaries: the economy as a whole could undergo a fundamental change, and several business sectors--drug companies, medical equipment manufacturers and insurance companies--will all be affected....

The other main problem with the healthcare delivery system is that it is not always working in the interest of patients. Government funding for hospitals has gradually diminished, while at the same time the state imposes price control on many services. The result is that hospitals often over-prescribe drugs, or sell expensive patented drugs with a high mark-up. The hospital benefits financially from this because not only do they prescribe the drugs, they dispense them too. Hospitals in China make around 60% of their revenues from prescribing drugs, compared to the 10% to 20% that is typical in Western countries. In the draft guidelines, released last year, there were plans to separate the prescribing and dispensing of drugs. But in the final document these were only introduced as a pilot plan, suggesting that the government has decided not to tackle the hospital inefficiencies head on, but indirectly through improvements in the financing of treatment....

Seems like every country has the same problem.

The Legality of Centsports

| 1 Comment
Centsports.com has become very popular over the past two years.  For those unfamiliar with Centsports, you watch an ad and you get .10 cents to gamble on sports games.  cs.jpgThe website claims that the website is legal, because no money is ever deposited into the website.  This is the most recent interview with the founder.  

I have doubts about the supposed legality of the website. Sports betting is sports betting. They can argue that nobody ever put up any money and it's all "for fun". The DOJ will argue it's sports betting as covered under the Wire Act and players and the site are making money. Money is being made by watching the ads, and that cash is being used to gamble on sports online.  The Wire Act states:

Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest, or for the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

It's money, people are wagering on sports, and the site is presumably profiting from it. This sounds awfully like the business of wagering on sports, as covered under the Wire Act.

The DOJ probably won't come after the bettors, but they'll go after the site's owner. It doesn't help that the kid who runs the site lives in the United States, Texas to say the least. If he gets "investigated", I'll be willing to bet top dollar the site will buckle. On that corollary, whenever you can reasonably cash out, you should do so. There are no guarantees with this site. 

What centsports is hoping is that if they stay a small fish (betting cents), they'll be under the DOJ radar. Considering the DOJ priority shifts, current resistance from online gamblers, and the new presidential administration, it's not a completely stupid decision. It's still a stupid decision though, because the site owner is gambling with jail time. To put it bluntly, jail sucks, so the EV of the crime better be worth the probability of jail time. 

The reason why the site refuses to post anything regarding its legality is because it's probably not legal. No reasonable lawyer will advise otherwise. Simple enough explanation.

I would put the odds of any prosecutor argument being successful in this particular case at 85%. That's just my educated guess.

Downsize the McSize p.4

| 0 Comments
Borders 40% off a single item coupon.  Good for only this weekend and inside the stores.  That's a real good deal!  Saving money in these uncertain times is always prudent.

sale_40_off_md.gif

MGM Bankruptcy Watch P.17

| 0 Comments
MGM plans to lend its name brand to a new casino resort in Egypt.  (Fool.com
*MGM already has a pyramid shaped casino in Las Vegas, so I don't think they'll be using a mini-pyramid design in Giza.  Perhaps the new resort will be in the shape of an iconic American symbol like a giant McDonald's themed restaurant casino and resort.

Jim Murren says there are no plans to sell any of its Vegas Casinos.  (Bloomberg
*Sure Jim.  I'm sure Vegas is due for a quick turnaround.  If you're not desperate on cash to repay your creditors to avoid bankruptcy, you can pay the creditors in casino chips.

Poker Acronyms

| 0 Comments
I just realize that I might not have been fully transparent with my use of acronyms in yesterday's post.  Let me fix that.
cm.jpg

    • ROI - Return On Investment.  It's the amount received divided by the amount paid in.  ROI's are commonly used in poker tournaments, gambling, and the investment world
    • ITM - In the Money.  It means lasting long enough in the tournament to receive one of the skewed prize payouts.
    • BB - Big Blinds.  Total number of chips divided by the big blind.  For poker tournaments, the exact amount of chips is not as important as your relative position in terms of big blinds.  
I hope that clarifies things somewhat.

Poker Romp -- Beginnings

| 0 Comments
Today my buddy "Low" and I went to our local casino to play a small fast poker tournament.  I'll be the first to admit that my NL Hold'em Tournament skills are mediocre at best.  At worst it's a 0% game.  I don't have anything close to a large sample size to draw any meaningful conclusions.

My records do indicate I've won more money playing slot, blackjack, and miscellaneous tournaments than poker tournaments.  It's always an issue of ROI and I have a higher ROI in misc tournaments.  

Granted I haven't played many poker tournaments, but that will all change in August when I will have all the free time in the world.  Like most other young males with too much free time, I harbor the secret fantasy of striking fame and fortune playing hold'em tournaments, despite lacking the skills to do so. 

I might have a favorable propensity in miscellaneous tournaments, but these tournaments are somewhat of a dead end.  The prize pools are considerably smaller than poker tournaments.  What good is being only quarter-rich and not famous?  

In order to climb the poker hierarchy, I will have to muck it through the small fast tournaments to gain some experience.  I'll have to fight a few homeless journeymen before I can fight Mike Tyson.  I might not even be strong enough to beat these journeymen.  We'll see.

For my poker tournament playing style, I will try my best to mimic the strategies in Poker Tournament Formula by Arnold Snyder.  Arnold is probably the person I most respect in the gambling community and I take everything he says seriously.  

* * *

Getting back to today's poker tournament.  My buddy "Low", another aspiring poker player, and I were playing at the local tournament with about 60 players.  We've been there together a total of 3 times.  I won first place once, and Low has been in the ITM twice.  An auspicious place to say the least.  

I busted out of the tournament halfway into the tournament.  I was in a desperately short situation with about 9BB left.  I had to get some chips quick and I was able to isolate the player on the dealer button with a pre-flop all in of 77 versus his AJo.  He pulled his J on the river.

The worst thing a tournament player can do is get blinded out.  In these fast tournaments, you'll have to shove many times on the coin flip situations.  

Low was in a desperately low situation as well.  Half-way into the tournament, he was in the awkward situation of only having 2.5BB left.  He was able to win many of the desperate coin flips.  Because he took this desperate situation of flipping and flipping, he caught some luck and made it into the final table.  With his competitive chip stack he was able to steal pots and he came out with a 3rd place finish.  

The point is that sometimes you'd just have to generate a lot of variance by doubling up.  I know it may come off as common sense to many people, but I suspect many are still too wimpy to follow the advice.  They always wait for the right cards and the right cards hardly ever come.

China Takes Over the World, p.12

| 0 Comments
 

Slightly dated, but Southpark proves to be a beacon of satirical reasoning.  

No, no, leave us alone....They're gonna take over the world.  There's too many of them.  No, no...Their economy is gonna get better with their advances in technology and they're gonna bring down America. (Cries, Cries)

Unrelated: Mass Hysteria Has Always Been Around

| 0 Comments
 

Fast forward to 2:25 and listen.  

Back in 1984 in an episode of Cheers, Diane makes a joke about the swine flu.  This episode was first shown 25 years ago and could be plucked from today's headlines.

The general public forgets mass hysteria too easily.  One minute it's swine flu, avian flu, SARs, the next it's our war on terror.  Mass hysteria has always been around so don't think the general public is perfect.  

For an even crazier incident of mass hysteria, check out the Demonic Ritual Day Care Sexual Assault Hysteria in the 1980s.

Much Too Soon to Call It

| 0 Comments
Last Thursday I said, "For people to start heralding a quick V shape recovery when the current economic feel is much more uncertain signals to me a disconnect with the reality.  I'm starting to think this current rally might have been a bit too much and too soon." 

Today the market dropped 2.2% for no readily apparent reason.  CNN Money thinks, "Stocks in recession retreat -- Worries that the economy is not likely to recover as soon as had been hoped drag on markets. Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq drop over 2%." 

Day-to-day movements have too much variability and it's difficult to attribute any ups and downs to any causal event.  Much too soon to call it a correct guess.

We'll just have to give it a few more weeks to know if the Market is going to slow down in response to the more uncertain economy (e.g. 0% economy).

Notable Headlines - Obama Said It

| 0 Comments
Obama says America could "go the way of GM" without a legislative fix to healthcare.  (AP)

China Takes Over the World, p.11

| 0 Comments
The Gao Kao is the Chinese equivalent of the American SATs.  The pressure is intense, because it determines what colleges students will be accepted.  According to NYT, Chinese students study up to 14 to 16 hours a day and take one day off out out of three weeks. 

How can any nation compete against a nation of Type A gunners that China is cranking out?

Drawing from my law school experience, you can't compete against a bunch of gunners unless you are one yourself.  You can't win a race against people who are running full speed, when you are learning how to crawl.

The amount of studying is like a prisoner's dilemma.  Students would be better off, if they all studied very little (bottom right quadrant).  Because there are rewards from intense studying when other students are slacking, all default to intense studying.  All students will resort to harmful Type A studying, and will be worse for wear (top left quadrant).  


prisonersdilemma.gif

Am I Guilty of Selection Bias?

| 2 Comments
Back in January 12, 2009 I wrote this:

The big take home for 2009 is the death of free markets. We weren't truly free markets to begin with, but government spending will be the biggest game in 2009. Our markets are going to start looking like the "Chinese Markets" with its government involvement. I can't say with absolute certainty what the next administration will focus it's capital on, but I feel confident in saying they will spend/spend/spend because we are fighting a Depression.... 


I received some flak with people calling into the whole philosophical definition of words.  There's not much value in arguments (outside of legal arguments) when people raise definitional issues to an argument.  It usually means they've ran out of counter-arguments.

Anyway, Businessweek has a nice article about the "Campaign for Free Enterprise".  Some businesses are fed up with government control.  They're even comparing the government control to communist Russia and that we're no longer in free markets.

I'd say that's pretty close to the above prediction.  I might be guilty of picking the one article out of the universe that supports my point, but it's pretty spot on.

Gambling MySpace? Won't work.

| 2 Comments

nw.jpg
As was reported by the Bear, Resorts Atlantic City is hoping to capitalize on online social networks by offering a network that revolves around gambling, MyResortsCasino.  

I just don't see it making significant inroads for two very strong reasons:

    1. Gambling is a stigma and it's difficult for people to profess a liking for it.
    2. The value from online networks is dependent on the number of members.  The network is very small meaning it has very little value in drawing people.
The stigma of being labeled a "degenerate gambler" probably outweighs any slight benefit of the network.  

I used to know a fancy ten dollar equation that describes the strength of networks based on the number of members.  It escapes me at the moment, but the above intuition makes sense enough.

NYT Writes About US Online Gambling Again

| 0 Comments
As was previously reported by the the New York Times about US Poker players getting their money frozen, a new NYT blog entry offers a valuable tidbit from Professor Nelson Rose.  

Online poker player should diversify by having their money in multiple accounts in the case of government seizures.  The advice for all online gamblers to diversify into multiple accounts is valuable overall.  There are too many shady casino companies, e-wallets, and outright theft.  It's prudent to hedge your funds even though it might reduce liquidity.

There's not much in the way of diversification for US Gamblers because of limited options, but every little bit helps.  

Strong is Weak, Weak is Strong

| 0 Comments
One of the best ideas to take from Caro's Book of Poker Tells is the notion of players trying to mask their strength by acting the complete opposite.  Players with weak hands tend to act too strong.  Players with strong hands act too weak.  The instinct is to use deception to win as much money as possible.  Weak players just don't realize that better players are one game step ahead and use weak players' deceptions to their advantage.  

The market sometimes operate on this similar contrarian principle. Widely read newspapers and magazines can be the ultimate contrarian indicators.  When the newspapers are forecasting the Golden Age of wealth, it's time to sell.  When newspapers are reporting the apocalypse, it's time to buy.

wl.jpg
The current market rally from March is giving me some cause for concern.  The economy is operating very much like I predicted since January.  The transition from bad news to "not so bad" news is the likely driving reason for the current market rally.

The problem with this current market rally is the sudden and explosive gains.  The returns are so strong and so soon, some newspapers are reporting a quick V shaped recovery.  

My economist hat tells me this recovery won't be as soon and as quick as the newspapers report.  While the US is moving out of negative growth towards 0% growth, the move from 0% to +% growth is much more uncertain.  

I just don't see much in the way of increased consumer spending (slight increases but not that great) or more business spending to drive positive growth, at least not yet.

For people to start heralding a quick V shape recovery when the current economic feel is much more uncertain signals to me a disconnect with the reality.  I'm starting to think this current rally might have been a bit too much and too soon.  

MGM Bankruptcy Watch p.16

| 0 Comments
MGM has just acquired some breathing room by selling approximately 3% of it's shares to Malaysian investors.  The extra $100m infusion should allow them to shore up their books.

Perhaps these investors aren't familiar with the fact that Fontainebleau, another incomplete large resort down the strip, is having trouble completing their large hotel and is declaring bankruptcy.

fontaine.jpg

You know.  They say Asians are the biggest gamblers, and this 100 million gamble is as big as it gets.

US Online Payment Processor Gets Frozen

| 0 Comments
The New York Times is reporting two payment processors that handle poker funds for Full Tilt Poker and Poker Stars have been frozen.  This cat and mouse game has been ongoing for American players since the 90's.

My legal hat says the payment processors will be fighting this seizure in the courts.  The legal arguments that the US Wire Act does not apply to poker will be put to a legal test.

The Chinese Are Frustrated With the Americans, p.10

| 0 Comments
SystemFont.ashx.gif
These are the Chinese characters for domination.  China is dominating the United States.  

 In further proof that China is taking over the world, Tim Geithner has to appease the Chinese by promising to be fiscally responsible.  

China owns approximately 10% of outstanding US public debt and they need the Chinese to continually buy more debt or at least not dump their current debt for the United States to climb out of this recession.  Good luck with that, Tim.

Since China has been relatively insulated from this financial crises, I wouldn't be surprised if China comes out of this hole earlier.  

GXC has increased about 24% from the time I mentioned it on April 22.

Social Security is a Pyramid Scheme p.3

| 0 Comments
As we get closer and closer to 2016, more and more articles like these will exponentially appear.  This is from Businessweek, not the Berkeley Daily.  Alarmingly,

This [Social Security funds] amounts to funding your IRA by filling a cookie jar with IOUs from yourself. The stream of revenue is real, but the IOUs are at best only a moral promise to keep paying benefits, which arguably will still exist after the trust fund runs out.

FEARS ARE WARRANTED
However, it's impossible to turn the estimates into good news even with the lowest plausible projections of cost escalation. If anything, the trustees' estimates look too optimistic, as they traditionally have been. Raising the age of eligibility seems even more of a nonstarter for Medicare than for Social Security.

Does anyone in office even think about this problem?  Does anyone even honestly think that Social Security is not a pyramid scheme?


Stoft-2005-SSTrust-w-private-accounts.gif


Occupational Hazards - Losing While Winning

| 1 Comment
The general public just doesn't realize that even if you have an edge in gambling or investing, you can still lose.  It's so counter-intuitive and jarring for so many people that if they had the same exact recipe as any other legitimately successful money manager, they couldn't do it.  They can't replicate the success of these earners, because they can't handle the losing it takes to win.  

haz.gif
Forgive me if I can't reveal any specifics like the location, amount wagered, or what type of game that I played.  Not too long ago, I was playing a game with a 20% edge.  This 20% edge isn't some made up figure.  It has been computer simmed by billions of trials.  It has been subjected to the law of large numbers.  The 20% is the approximate expected value from continued play.

Even with this huge 20% edge, I still lost.  The best blackjack card counters can only expect about a 2% return on each hand on average.  An S&P Index fund will get you maybe 10% a year.  20% is a bigger edge with the added benefit of being able to play multiple hands.

I lost because of the variance, plain and simple.  The 20% game operates on the principle that you lose a lot of times.  The few times that you win, your wins more than make up for the losses.  You never win 20% on each hand.  It's only when you average the large number of losses with the rare gigantic wins that you arrive at the magic 20%.  Unfortunately, I just never received any of the rare wins and that's why I came up short.  

The variance on investing, sports betting, and blackjack is considerably less than this game but the variance still exists.  Similar to how investing in a broad based market fund is a good bet, people still lose money.  This principle of losing money to make money is something that people will never get.  You just have to trust the averages.

Out Until Monday

| 0 Comments
gf.jpgI'll be in Chicago for the weekend for a medical school graduation. The best investment in life is to marry a doctor.

Harrah's Eyeing Taiwan, Japan??

| 0 Comments
The Straits Time is reporting that Harrah's wants to get its claws into Japan and Taiwain.  There are three major problems with the article.  

  1. Harrah's is now Caesars Entertainment.
  2. I didn't know there was legalized casino gambling in the respective countries.  The closest thing to gambling in Japan are the pachinko parlors.
  3. Caesar's doesn't have the political or financial capital to change any of the laws in those two countries.  They're dealing with bankruptcy concerns.

What a company wants is completely different from what's feasible.  What a stupid article.

Cities With the Worst Unemployment

| 0 Comments
UNEMPLOYMENT.JPG

MGM Bankruptcy Watch, p.15

| 0 Comments
MGMCC.JPG

The real estate value in Vegas has dropped dramatically but CityCenter has refused to lower prices on it's yet to be complete condo.  The dilemma revolves around the buyers.  Many have put down payments of 20 to 30% on their million dollar plus condos, but the fair market value of their condos have dropped as much as an estimated 75%.  30 to 50% is probably the more likely estimate.  In that situation, most buyers would want to walk away from the deal preferably with their deposit.  

I don't have copies of these exact contracts, so I can't apply any legal analysis.  Something to keep in mind is that these property contracts are enforceable on the moment they're signed. If the condo owners signed any contract along with their easement money, which they probably did,  the landowner can sue for specific performance of the contract.  This assumes that the condos are complete and ready to be delivered by the contract date.  CityCenter is not yet complete.

CityCenter is in a tough bind, because if enough buyers walk away from their contracts then MGM might not have enough capital to finish their condos.  If they can't finish the condos, they'd have to return all of the deposits for failure to deliver the specified property.  If they lower the contract prices, they'd get hit in the gut.

MGM better start looking into its couches and hitting up their rich uncles, because they'd be far better off using borrowed money to complete the condos than have to make concessions to buyers.  The problem is their creditworthiness is already shot.
Yesterday I wrote about some of the analytical framework that goes on in setting the sports line.  I might as well tie together this analytical framework in setting point spreads to investing, and economics.


Sports Gambling
  • Point Spread =  Home Court + Team Stats + Popularity +.......

Economics
  • GDP  = Consumer Spending + Business Investments + Government Spending + Net Trade

Investing
  • Stock Price = Earnings Per Share + Book Value + Market Cap +.....

In the three examples, an outcome can be estimated through regression analysis.  How we determine the  ultimate value of something is based on the parts that make up the thing.  Using regression analysis can be one of the most powerful ways of finding the truth in gambling, investing, and economics.


Note:  I've dumbed things down considerably to make this as accessible as possible.  There's also usually a coefficient value in front of each factor, but adding coefficients would make it look more confusing.  There's also the assortment of problems from data mining, multicollinearity, bad models, etc., etc.  But the three example is its simplest form

NBA Finals - Game 1

| 1 Comment
nba-logo.jpgThe sports book numbers on big action games like the NBA playoffs and the Superbowl are pretty damn accurate.  The lines are usually set right down the middle, splitting the action.

Anyway, the line for the first game in the Lakers-Magic roundup is soundly set at -6 for the Lakers.  This sounds just about right -- maybe with a slight over shading for the Lakers.  I would have thought -5.5 would have been a more accurate line.

The average home court advantage is about 4 points.  The other 1.5 points is probably the result of a slightly better Lakers team even though the Magic came out ahead in the regular season (the line now factors in the injured Nelson).

In my opinion, the last .5 point is the shading for the general public in favoring dynasty teams like the Lakers.  This represents value for the Sharp players, but if you're unfortunately betting with the normal -110, aka 4.5% trading costs, then the extra half point just means it will be a break even proposition.  

Each additional half point in NBA is usually worth about 4%.  Having a 4% bonus from the general public doesn't add up to anything when you subtract out the 4.5% cost.

If you can find a bet paying even money +100 (like it is at Matchbook), then Orlando +6 is probably the sharp bet.  

But hey, what do I know about basketball?